Academy · For organisations

Corporate Generative AI Training
for Your Teams

Hands-on GenAI training tailored to your team's roles and workflows — delivered on-site, online or hybrid, and scoped to your context rather than sold off a shelf.

See the curricula →

We reply within one business day with a programme brief you can share internally.

300+Corporate Professionals Trained
3Enterprise & academic partners
On-siteOnline or hybrid delivery

Who it's for

Who the training is for

Training is usually specified by one of three roles, and each arrives needing a different thing from this page.

HR & L&D

You own the capability plan

You need a programme that maps to roles rather than a seat licence nobody opens, and evidence you can put in front of a sponsor. We scope against the functions you name and come back with a brief you can circulate.

Engineering leadership

You own what ships

Your teams can call an API and still cannot tell you why the agent fails in production. The technical track is built against your stack and your systems, so what they practise on is the thing they maintain.

Executive sponsors

You own the decision

You are being asked to fund AI work and want to judge it without taking a vendor's word for the numbers. The executive programme is decision-focused: opportunity mapping, cost and ROI, build-vs-buy, governance.

Programmes

What we run today

Choose training for engineering teams, business functions, or leadership — which one fits comes down to what the people in the room will do with AI: build it, use it in their own work, or decide where it belongs. Each card links to its full curriculum below.

Technical teams

Generative AI Engineering Training

Engineering, product and platform teams who will build and maintain AI features

A hands-on build programme run privately for one organisation, pointed at the systems and use cases agreed during scoping.

  • Agents, automations and RAG on your stack
  • Evaluation — how you know it works before users do
  • Scoping that survives your real constraints
  • Capstone reviewed against your roadmap
Business & finance teams

AI with Finance & Business

Business, finance and operations people who will use AI in their own work, not build it

Generative AI applied to the analysis, reporting and drafting work a business team already does, with no programming background assumed.

  • Structured prompting for analysis, drafting and reporting
  • Checking AI output before it informs a decision
  • Research synthesis and source verification
  • Where AI improves a business process, and where it does not
Leadership

The AI Boardroom

Leadership teams deciding where AI belongs in the P&L

A private executive programme ending in a one-page AI roadmap your board can act on.

  • Build vs. buy vs. wait, as a decision framework
  • Real cost and ROI — TCO, vendor evaluation, budgeting
  • Governance and risk, scoped to what the organisation is actually deploying
  • Capstone: your company's one-page AI roadmap
Institutions

Campus Gen AI Programs

Universities and institutions running cohorts for students and faculty

Gen AI and AI with Finance programmes delivered on campus or online, for technical and non-technical cohorts.

  • Gen AI and AI with Finance tracks
  • Technical and non-technical undergraduate cohorts
  • Project-based, assessed on what students produce
  • In-person or online cohorts

Outcomes

What your teams can do afterwards

What each programme is designed to build, and who it applies to.

Build something real, not a demo

Sessions end in working output rather than notes. On the engineering programme that output is built against systems and data agreed during scoping, and the capstone is reviewed against your roadmap.

Generative AI Engineering Training

Know when the answer is not AI

Scoping is taught as a first-class skill. Participants leave able to say which problems a language model genuinely improves and which it makes slower or more expensive.

All programmes

Evaluate before users do

Teams practise building the evaluation set that tells them a change made things worse — the check that catches a regression before it reaches a user.

Generative AI Engineering Training

Judge vendors and costs

Opportunity mapping, total cost of ownership and build-vs-buy — enough to interrogate a vendor proposal on its economics rather than on its demo.

The AI Boardroom

Curriculum

Curriculum by audience

Choose training for engineering teams, business functions, or leadership. Each programme lists who it is for, what it assumes, its learning objectives and the topics it covers. Depth, emphasis and exercises are agreed with your team during scoping.

Technical teams

Generative AI Engineering Training

Who it is for

Engineers, product and platform people who will build and maintain AI features — the team that will still own the system after the training ends.

Prerequisites

Working software development experience. Participants should be comfortable reading and writing code in a language their team already uses; no prior machine-learning background is assumed. Exercises can run against representative material — production access is not required to attend.

Learning objectives

  • Design an agent or retrieval feature and explain why that shape was chosen
  • Build a retrieval pipeline and diagnose whether a bad answer is a retrieval problem or a model problem
  • Write an evaluation set that catches a regression before it reaches users
  • Scope and cost an AI feature against real constraints, including deciding not to build it

Topics covered

  • How LLMs work at the level a practitioner needs — tokens, context, confabulation
  • Prompting for professional, repeatable output
  • Agents and multi-step automations
  • RAG — retrieval design, chunking, and when not to use it
  • Connecting models to existing data and tools
  • AI-assisted development in your own repositories
  • Evaluation sets and regression checks
  • Failure modes: context, memory, silent model changes
  • Scoping and costing an AI feature
Example exercise

Take a documentation corpus agreed during scoping, build a retrieval pipeline over it, then deliberately break it — ask questions the corpus cannot answer, and questions where the right passage ranks third — and write the evaluation set that catches both before a user does.

Final scope is agreed with your team.

What participants leave withA capstone built during the programme and reviewed against your own roadmap.
How delivery is scoped →

Related reading: Read the evaluation topic in full: The AI MVP Evaluation Set

Business & finance teams

AI with Finance & Business

Who it is for

Business, finance and operations people who will use AI in their own work rather than build it — analysts, reporting and planning roles, and the managers who review their output.

Prerequisites

No programming background assumed. Participants should be fluent in their own analysis or reporting work; the programme applies AI to that work rather than teaching the work itself.

Learning objectives

  • Write structured prompts — task, context, constraints and output format — that produce usable, checkable business output
  • Draft and review workplace documents against a four-point gate: accuracy, tone, compliance and context
  • Check an AI summary for omissions and invented detail before it informs a decision
  • Run research synthesis with AI tools and verify the claims against sources
  • Tell a grounded, document-based answer from an ungrounded one, and verify before acting on either

Topics covered

  • Structured prompting: the four ingredients, role and context, iterative refinement
  • Prompt patterns — summarise, compare, rewrite, classify, critique — and the prompt audit
  • Workplace writing: structured email drafting, summary fidelity, report scaffolds with verification placeholders
  • Research synthesis and source verification; citation practice with AI assistance
  • Presentation and visual content, and reviewing it for professionalism and accuracy
  • Document-grounded question answering, and the limits of retrieval
  • Handling sensitive data in prompts — placeholders rather than real records
  • Where AI improves a business process, and where it does not
Example exercise

Take a recurring report your team already produces. Draft it from a structured prompt, then run the review gate over the output: check every figure against its source, mark what the draft omitted, and flag anything it asserted that the source does not support.

Final scope is agreed with your team.

Participant outputThe participant output is agreed during scoping, because what is useful differs sharply between a finance function and an operations team. A workflow portfolio — the brief, the prompts, the review steps and the verification trail — is the usual shape.
University programme

This curriculum is delivered today for undergraduate business cohorts at Chitkara Business School. Activities from those courses include:

  • Drafting workplace emails from a six-part structured prompt, then reviewing the drafts for accuracy, tone, compliance and context
  • Checking a summary for the omission and the invented fact; scaffolding a report with explicit verification placeholders
  • Building a portfolio of prompts for a business use case, each with its rationale, iterations and an evaluation of the output
  • Comparing grounded and ungrounded answers from an uploaded policy document, then running a five-step verification routine
Read the full Chitkara curriculum profile →
How delivery is scoped →

Related reading: Why non-technical cohorts disengage, and what it means for programme design

Leadership

The AI Boardroom

Who it is for

Leadership and executive teams deciding where AI belongs in the P&L — sponsors who fund AI work and are asked to judge it, rather than people who will implement it.

Prerequisites

None technical. Participants need familiarity with their own cost base and business functions; there is no implementation work in this programme.

Learning objectives

  • Map AI opportunities across your own business functions and rank them
  • Apply a build-vs-buy-vs-wait framework to a specific proposal on your desk
  • Interrogate a vendor proposal on total cost of ownership rather than on a demo
  • Set governance and risk expectations proportionate to what is actually being deployed

Topics covered

  • AI opportunity mapping across business functions
  • Build vs. buy vs. wait, as a decision framework
  • Real cost and ROI — TCO, vendor evaluation, budgeting
  • Governance and risk, scoped to what the organisation is deploying
Example exercise

Take one AI proposal the leadership team is currently being asked to approve, and run it through the framework in the room: where it sits on the opportunity map, what the total cost looks like over a year rather than at purchase, and what would have to be true for the answer to be wait.

Final scope is agreed with your team.

What participants leave withA one-page AI roadmap for your company, produced as the programme capstone.
How delivery is scoped →

Related reading: The build-vs-buy data this module works from

Campus programmes draw on the same two curricula — Gen AI and AI with Finance — adapted for student and faculty cohorts. See Campus Gen AI Programs above.

Delivery & engagement

How it runs, and how we get there

Format

On-site, online or hybrid

All three are live delivery. Our TCS engagement ran as a 30-day in-person intensive; other programmes run entirely online. Delivery mode is a scoping decision, not a fixed constraint.

Group size

10–30 executive · up to ~40 build

Larger groups are divided into smaller cohorts to maintain practical feedback on each participant's own work.

Customisation

Pointed at your stack

Exercises and datasets are agreed during scoping. On the engineering programme that usually means your own systems and use cases; business and leadership programmes more often work from representative material, so no team has to arrange production access to attend.

From enquiry to proposal

Step 1

Tell us the shape of it

Audience, approximate team size and what should be different afterwards. Two minutes on the form.

Step 2

Programme brief within one business day

A written outline of what the programme would cover for your teams, in a form you can forward internally.

Step 3

Scoping conversation

Delivery mode, duration, which systems the exercises point at, and how much is tailored. This is what a cost depends on, so it comes before a number.

Step 4

Costed proposal and dates

A proposal reflecting what we scoped, with delivery dates. Corporate programmes are scoped rather than sold per seat.

There is no published per-seat price. A cost depends on what comes out of step 3, which is why the scoping conversation happens before the number rather than after it.

Evidence

Where we have delivered

300+ corporate professionals trained. Each engagement below is labelled with the kind of delivery it represents.

Tata Consultancy Services

Corporate delivery

A 30-day intensive Gen AI cohort delivered on-site, taking enterprise teams from fundamentals to building real AI workflows. An ongoing online cohort for TCS professionals continues.

In-person & online cohorts30-day intensive · Chennai

LearnQuest

Delivery partner

A delivery partnership: we run a range of online, project-based AI training programmes with LearnQuest — build-first curricula that take learners from concepts to shipped projects.

Delivery partnerProject-based online programs

Chitkara University

University programme

Two AI curricula for Chitkara Business School BBA cohorts: a no-code introduction to AI and machine learning, and a hands-on generative AI course for FinTech students.

Gen AI & AI with FinanceTechnical and non-technical cohortsBBA cohorts
Read the curriculum profile →

In their own words

What people say after the programme

From our 8-week online Generative AI cohorts, quoted from posts they published themselves.

This has been a valuable learning experience that strengthened my understanding of Generative AI and helped me grow while building skills relevant for the future. I’m especially grateful to Surya Pratap Singh for his guidance, support, and expertise throughout the program.
Deepti GandhiSystem Engineer, TCSCompleted · 8-week online Gen AI cohortSource
This program is not just about learning AI tools—it’s about understanding how to design and build enterprise-grade AI systems that can solve real business challenges at scale. While I still have a lot to learn, reaching this midpoint has made me more confident in navigating the AI ecosystem than ever before.
Vikas SharmaSolution Architect, TCSMidway · 8-week online Gen AI cohortSource
A big thank you to Tata Consultancy Services for facilitating such a great learning journey! Special thanks to Surya Pratap Singh for being a fantastic classroom trainer, and to LearnQuest for providing insightful course content and hands-on sessions.
Shweta SaxenaSenior DevOps Engineer, TCSCompleted · Gen AI training programmeSource

Who delivers it

Taught by the people who build AI systems commercially

The engineering, business and leadership programmes are delivered by the same trainer.

SP

Surya Pratap

Founder, IdeaToMVP · 12+ years in AI & Blockchain

linkedin.com/in/surya-pratap-singh095

Surya leads the studio behind 15+ shipped AI products — multi-agent systems, RAG platforms, and production automations. He has delivered Gen AI corporate training to 300+ professionals across enterprise teams. Plain English, real architecture, zero hand-waving.

Scoping

What teams ask first

Who is this for — do our teams need to be technical?

No. Generative AI Engineering Training assumes people who write or maintain software. AI with Finance & Business assumes no programming background — it is built around prompting, drafting, analysis and verification rather than implementation, and we teach a no-code AI and machine-learning course on the same basis for Chitkara Business School BBA cohorts. The AI Boardroom is different again: no implementation work, aimed at leadership deciding where AI belongs. Tell us who is in the room and we will say which fits.

What group sizes do you run?

Typically 10–30 people for an executive programme and up to around 40 for a build-focused cohort. Larger groups are divided into smaller cohorts so that every participant still gets practical feedback on their own work, which is the part of the programme that does the teaching.

Do you deliver on-site?

Yes — on-site, online or hybrid. Our TCS engagement ran as a 30-day in-person intensive; other programmes run entirely online. Delivery mode is part of scoping, not a fixed constraint.

How is this different from a generic AI course?

Two things. The curriculum comes out of building AI systems commercially, so it covers the failure modes, costs and evaluation work that show up after launch rather than only the happy path. And the programmes are practical: the engineering track builds against systems and datasets agreed during scoping, and the business and leadership tracks work through your own processes and decisions.

How does pricing work?

Corporate programmes are scoped rather than sold per seat — team size, delivery mode, duration and how much of it is tailored to your context. Send an enquiry and we will come back within one business day with a programme brief you can share internally, then scope the details before costing it.

Can you train a team on a specific stack or tool?

Usually, yes. Most requests are some version of agents, RAG, evaluation, or AI-assisted development on a named stack. We teach the stacks we work with commercially, and if a request falls outside those we will tell you during scoping rather than take the engagement. That commercial work is our AI agent development practice, if you need the systems built as well as the team trained.

Tell us the shape of it

Who needs training, roughly how many, and what should be different in two quarters. We'll come back with a brief you can forward.

Looking for the individual founder cohort instead? See the Founder Sprint Curriculum or compare it with the executive programme.